League of Women Voters of Cook County
  • Home
  • About
    • LWVCC Interest Groups >
      • Cook County & MWRD Group
      • Criminal Justice
      • Cook County Health
      • Forest Preserve Interest Group
    • LWVCC Positions
    • LWVCC Action and Testimony
    • LWVCC Activities
    • Archived Newsletters
  • Observer Reports
    • Cook County Board Observer Reports
    • MWRD Board Observer Reports
    • CCH Board Observer Reports
    • Forest Preserve Board Observer Reports
  • Voter Info
  • Cook County Gov. Contacts
    • Cook County Board
    • Forest Preserve Board
    • Cook County Elected Officials
    • MWRD Board
    • Cook County Health Board

Cook County Commissioners Hear from Land Bank Authority and Asset Management at Budget Hearings

11/5/2017

0 Comments

 
Cook County Board of Commissioners Finance Committee - Departmental Budget Hearings 
November 2, 21017


Land Bank Authority
Bureau of Asset Management


Commissioners Present:
Daley,Moody, Deer, Simms, Gainer, Suffredin, Arroyo, Garcia, Boykin, Schneider, Tobolski

Commissioners Absent: Moore,Fritchey,Butler, Goslin, Silverstri,Morrison,
Since the Land Bank Authority (LBA) is mostly self funded there were few substantive questions. Lots of commissioners thanked the Director, Robert Rose, for his hard work and his successes. Comm. Gainer also received much thanks as she is one of the organizers of this authority.
The Land Bank Authority’s mission is to reduce abandoned and vacant properties in Cook County. It also aims to match properties that have been rehabbed with potential home buyers and /or developers. The Home Buyer Direct Programs has been very successful for first time home buyers.
Some highlights of Director Rose’s Presentation:

  1. The Land Bank Authority is the largest of its kind in the nation.
  2. They have acquired 669 properties and sold over 400. They have demolished over 65 major buildings.
  3. They buy and sell properties slowly and methodically. Mr. Rose compared this to Detroit that has been buying and selling properties too quickly, perhaps with not enough attention to rehabbing new buildings to code.
  4. 3/4 of the homes sold to buyers, 1/4 to renters. Prices are usually in order to encourage first time home ownership.
  5. The agency is self-funded, profits go back into the agency in order to acquire and rehab more properties.
  6. Over $17 million has been created in new market values, amounts that can be taxed. They do work with HUD (the federal Housing and Urban Development cabinet dept.) in order to receive more money to do more work.
Questions and Answers:

  1. Comm. Arroyo asked if the sold properties are “out of our hands”. Mr. Rose said that developers have 1 year to redevelop the property. If they do not do so, the property returns to the LBA. Also the same occurs if there are code violations or if they are in behind on property taxes.
  2. Comm. Simms asked about the renters and if they had the “option to buy” at some point. Mr. Rose said that they did. She also asked how people find out about this program. The LBA goes out to community group meeting, housing expos, etc. and they have a website
  3. Comm. Suffredin asked why the LBA needed the approval of this board (the CC Board of Commissioners) in order to continue operations. Mr. Rose said that the LBA has its own board as well. But each year, the rules state that the LBA needs a continuing resolution from both boards. This year they are asking for a $3 million line of credit in order to acquire properties a bit faster.

Commissioners Present for Bureau of Asset Management Presentation: Daley, Morrison, Silvestri, Boykin, Garcia, Moody, Suffredin, Deer, Moore, Simms, Gainer, Arroyo 
Commissioners Absent: Goslin, Schneider,Butler, Fritchey,Tobolski

The Bureau of Assets Management reported on some of the same issues as the Capital Budget Dept. The main speaker again was Ann Kalayil , the Assets Manager. She was joined by Jessica Caffrey, the Real Estate Manager, and Earl Manning, the Director of Planning and Policy. All 3 answered questions, with Ann covering most of the material. This office is new. It was born in 2015 due to President Preckwinkle’s efforts. $260 million of assets are managed by this department. Some highlights of their presentation include:

  1. .$1 million was saved in 2017 by using mainly in- house workers as tradesmen and construction workers.
  2. Green technology has saved energy costs equal to the amount of electricity used in over 500 homes in 2017
  3. The “Trash into Cash” program has brought in over $200,000 mainly by recycling over 20 tons of waste in 2017.
  4. A trade school “pipeline” has been developed in which CPS students and students in Juvenile Detention are matched up with apprenticeship programs in various areas such as pipe- fitters, electricians, and carpenters. Many have received full time jobs after learning a specific trade.
  5. A Rosemont transit center is being planned with the village of Rosemont.
  6. The Central Campus Hospital will be completed by June of 2018. It is expected to employ 1300 new workers. (the site of the old Fantus Clinic)
  7. A study to improve the underground walkway or (pedway) is being commissioned.
Questions and Answers:

  1. Comm. Boykin asked for a list of all new employees ( in any new project) including the neighborhoods from which they come. A report would soon follow the hiring process according to Earl M.
  2. Comm. Moody asked about savings by using solar panels. Offices in the 5th district have used these panels with success. More will be forthcoming..
  3. Comm. Morrison asked about the rental possibilities from the 3 vacated floors in the Dunne Building. Ann K. said that other governmental agencies may be interested, especially those state workers in the Thompson Building, since it will be sold soon.
  4. Comm. Moore asked about the future use of the Hawthorne Warehouse complex. Several of the managers said it could possibly be turned into an Industrial park.
  5. Comm. Gainer asked many questions about the abuses of FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act). A back and forth discussion ensued with her and several of the presenters about abuses and lack of discipline for workers who take advantage of this. She blamed the abuses on a “culture of abuse”, dissatisfaction among employees, and a lax oversize style by management. Interestingly, Ann K. mentioned in her answer that much of the custodial staff used by her department came over from the custodial staff from the CC Jail. This comment earned some grunts from the audience as much has been written about the excessive absences and use of overtime at the CC Jail. The exchange ended with the presenters promising to look further into this matter in order to get to the root of the problem.

​Observer - Jan Goldberg 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Individual authors are credited at the end of each post.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015

    Categories

    All
    Assessor
    Ballot Referendum
    Board Of Review
    CCHHS
    Chief Judge
    Contracts
    Cook County Board
    Cook County Budget
    Cook County Health (CCH)
    Cook County Sheriff
    County Clerk
    Covid 19
    Criminal Justice
    Departmental Budget Hearings
    Economic Development
    Election Administration
    Environmental Control
    Ethics Ordinance
    Gun Violence
    Healthcare
    Independent Inspector General
    Paid Sick Leave
    Pensions
    Performance Based Management
    Police Matters
    Public Defender
    Recorder Of Deeds
    Shakman
    Soda Tax
    State's Attorney Office
    Taxes
    Tax Incentives
    Technology
    Transportation Plan

    RSS Feed

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF COOK COUNTY
332 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 634
Chicago, IL 60604

312/939-5935 x 127
info@lwvcookcounty.org
Terms and Conditions of Use
© Copyright League of Women Voters of Cook County, Illinois. All rights reserved.
Membership Information
CONTACT US
  • Home
  • About
    • LWVCC Interest Groups >
      • Cook County & MWRD Group
      • Criminal Justice
      • Cook County Health
      • Forest Preserve Interest Group
    • LWVCC Positions
    • LWVCC Action and Testimony
    • LWVCC Activities
    • Archived Newsletters
  • Observer Reports
    • Cook County Board Observer Reports
    • MWRD Board Observer Reports
    • CCH Board Observer Reports
    • Forest Preserve Board Observer Reports
  • Voter Info
  • Cook County Gov. Contacts
    • Cook County Board
    • Forest Preserve Board
    • Cook County Elected Officials
    • MWRD Board
    • Cook County Health Board