League of Women Voters of Cook County
  • Home
  • About
    • LWVCC Interest Groups >
      • Cook County Budget & Structure Group
      • Criminal Justice
      • Forest Preserve Interest Group
    • LWVCC Action and Testimony
    • LWVCC Activities
  • Observer Reports
    • Cook County Board Observer Reports
    • MWRD Board Observer Reports
    • Forest Preserve Board Observer Reports
    • CCH Board Observer Reports
  • Voter Info
  • Resources
    • Cook County Board
    • Forest Preserve Board
    • Cook County Elected Officials
    • MWRD Board
    • Cook County Health Board
    • Member Resources

Chief Judge Evans Presents Budget Request for 2017 Cook County Budget

11/3/2016

0 Comments

 
Cook County Board of Commissioners Finance Committee - Departmental Budget Hearings 
Day #8 - October 31, 2016


Chief Judge - presented by Tim Evans, Chief Judge        
Proposed Budget: 
FY17 - $286,208,131
            
FY16 - $237,665,358
Proposed FTEs:
FY17 - 3105
       
FY16 -  3175

Key Information Presented:
  • Weekend hearings will be held on juvenile cases so that Juveniles arrested on weekends will not have to be held in detention for long periods of time. Judges will be assigned to weekend duty
  • Juror payments have been decreased to the previous level of $17.20/day; Judge Evans wants to keep the jury pool large so “lawyers can’t game the system.”  and he will present amendments for this.
  • Judge Evans is requesting body cameras for probation officers who make home visits.  Cost for 67 cameras is $316,500.
  • Judge Evans indicated the 4-D program needs 7 more hearing officers to hear domestic relations—divorce issues  but was not specific as to what this program is for or how it works.

Questions/Comments from Commissioners
  • Comm. Boykin expressed concern that defendants with illegal guns are being let go.   Evans said it is parole board that makes that decision; judges are being appropriate in their decisions.  Evans explained the Public Safety Assessment (PSA) and how a defendant can have a low risk score despite being arrested while having a gun.  However, some judges may still hold for bond because of the gun.  Having a gun when arrested shouldn’t be treated the same under all circumstances, but the PSA doesn’t differentiate. “Judges don’t always follow the PSA score recommendation.” He also asked why people are in jail for petty offenses.  Evans would prefer no bail at all, but has to consider the state bail statute.  He stated the use of the new PSA has lowered the jail count.
  • Comm. Silvestri was concerned about the excessive overtime costs at the Juvenile Temporary Detention Center (JTDC).  JTDC Director Leonard Dixon explained that on any given day 35% of staff was out on FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) or regular sick leave.  Social Services department also has a high amount of overtime.  The Human Resources department will provide figures on FMLA leave.  This is a problem throughout the country according to Director Dixon.
  • Asked about released homeless defendants:  Evans said there is nothing in his budget to help find services and home for these people.
  • Asked about the use of the PSA in suburban courts, Evans said there is a timetable for having all courts use the PSA and that all (bond court?) judges have been trained  with good results.  The PSA is used only to assess persons charged with felonies, not misdemeanors.
  • Comm. Steele was concerned about high bail amounts for little crimes.  Evans stated that government officials need to support judges who release defendants based on the PSA and yet they commit another crime.  
  • Restorative Justice procedure explained by Evans.
  • Comm. Gainer asked it the court tracks metrics on how the different judges ruled on bond.  Evans did not want individual judges to be tracked and have this made public.  Clerk Brown previously said these metrics were already being collected and could be released.  Evans will get back to Gainer after speaking with Attorney General Madigan’s office.  Both agreed that judges’ names could be left off the metrics.
  • Comm. Daley submitted a written question regarding excessive management personnel at the Adult Probation Dept.  He is concerned about cost effectiveness and efficiency. Evans’ Executive Officer Anderson answered with a long series of charts and explanations which can be seen on Legistar.  This observer has no idea whether the charts show cost-effectiveness and efficiency or not.
Observer - Karin Hribar 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Individual authors are credited at the end of each post.

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015

    Categories

    All
    ARPA Funds
    Assessor
    Ballot Referendum
    Board Of Review
    CCHHS
    Chief Judge
    Contracts
    Cook County Board
    Cook County Budget
    Cook County Health (CCH)
    Cook County Sheriff
    County Clerk
    Covid 19
    Criminal Justice
    Departmental Budget Hearings
    Economic Development
    Election Administration
    Environmental Control
    Ethics Ordinance
    Gun Violence
    Healthcare
    Independent Inspector General
    Paid Sick Leave
    Pensions
    Performance Based Management
    Police Matters
    Public Defender
    Recorder Of Deeds
    Shakman
    Soda Tax
    State's Attorney Office
    Taxes
    Tax Incentives
    Technology
    Transportation Plan

    RSS Feed

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF COOK COUNTY
332 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 634
Chicago, IL 60604

312/939-5935 
[email protected]
Terms and Conditions of Use
© Copyright League of Women Voters of Cook County, Illinois. All rights reserved.
Membership Information
CONTACT US
  • Home
  • About
    • LWVCC Interest Groups >
      • Cook County Budget & Structure Group
      • Criminal Justice
      • Forest Preserve Interest Group
    • LWVCC Action and Testimony
    • LWVCC Activities
  • Observer Reports
    • Cook County Board Observer Reports
    • MWRD Board Observer Reports
    • Forest Preserve Board Observer Reports
    • CCH Board Observer Reports
  • Voter Info
  • Resources
    • Cook County Board
    • Forest Preserve Board
    • Cook County Elected Officials
    • MWRD Board
    • Cook County Health Board
    • Member Resources