League of Women Voters of Cook County
  • Home
  • About
    • LWVCC Positions
    • LWVCC Interest Groups >
      • Budget & Structure
      • Criminal Justice
      • Cook County Health
      • Forest Preserve Interest Group
    • Archived Newsletters
    • LWVCC Action and Testimony
    • LWVCC Activities
  • Observer Reports
    • Cook County Board Observer Reports
    • MWRD Board Observer Reports
    • CCH Board Observer Reports
    • Forest Preserve Board Observer Reports
  • Voter Info
  • Cook County Gov. Contacts
    • Cook County Board
    • Forest Preserve Board
    • Cook County Elected Officials
    • MWRD Board
    • Cook County Health Board

Budget Meetings Reveal Cook County Commissioners’ Concerns with Proposed Beverage Tax

10/25/2016

0 Comments

 
Cook County Board Finance Committee - Departmental Budget Hearings for 2017 Budget
October 17,2016


Overview of Proposed 2017 Executive Budget

Total  Revenues
FY17 - $3,464.8 
FY16 -  $3,374.8
Difference - Increase of $89.97 (2.7%)

Total Expenditures
FY17 - $3,464.8M

FY17 -    $3,374.8M    
Difference - Increase of $89.97M (2.7%)
When Special Purpose Funds, Grants, and Capital Budget are also included Total Budget is $4.8Billion 
 
Some observations by CFO Samstein on 
Executive Budget::
  • If exclude additional pension contribution, General and Health Funds Budget is essentially flat, with only a 0.2% increase
  • That small of an increase is even with the Sweetened Beverage Tax proposed to be effective on July 1, 2016
  • The $74.6 million projected to be collected in 2017 from this new Tax covers only 4 months of collection, from August through November.
  • Project that in fiscal 2018, the full year collection of this Tax will be $224 million.
  • But those additional revenues will be needed to offset further expected declines in some of the existing revenue streams (such as cigarette tax).
  • Definition of “Sweetened Beverage” for tax is broad; modelled on similar tax in Philadelphia.
  • May be challenged in court (Philadelphia has been).
  • Full year of sales tax increase in 2017 projected to result in $470 million.
  • General Fund Balance (which some refer to as “reserves”) was about $99 million at end of 2015.  Expect about that at end of 2016.  But would like to have 1 to 2 months of General Fund expenditures in General Fund Balance, and this falls short of that goal.
  • Normally provide non-union employees with raises equivalent to those of union employees.  Breaking from that this year and only giving non-union employees an increase of 1.5%, representing cost of living, but some of the higher paid employees capped.  However, step increases are being given
Questions from Commissioners focused on:
  • Proposed Sweetened Beverage Tax
  • Viability of keeping promise not to raise any other taxes for next 3 years
  • Pensions and what plans does President have to propose other legislation since prior plan is stuck (told that starting discussions with key players like unions now)
  • Layoffs
  • Savings for not treating non-union employees like union for purposes of raises

Bureau of Finance 
Includes Departments of Revenue, Risk Management, Budget & Management Services; County Comptroller; Offices of CFO, Contract Compliance, Enterprise Resource Planning, and Chief Procurement Officer


Proposed Budget: 
FY17 - $23.95 million ($20.79 million + $3.16 million in benefits)
FY16 - $19.79 million without benefits.  
Difference - Increase of $1 million in 2017.

Proposed FTEs: 
FY17 - 230.3
FY16 - 235.7
Difference - Decrease of 5.4 FTEs.

Key Point for 2017 Proposed Budget Presented
  • For first time, allocating employee benefit costs to departments
  • These include employee health insurance allotment, life insurance, health insurance, dental insurance, unemployment compensation, vision care insurance, group pharmacy insurance
  • These previously in separate, county-wide category of Fixed Costs, which is much lower for 2017 as a result
  • But this makes it difficult to compare department costs proposed in 2017 to 2016

Questions/Comments from Commissioners for Bureau Departments included:
  • Do employees recognize how much County is providing in way of benefits vs. what would receive if went elsewhere.
  • Comm. Gainer wants wellness incentives (healthier employees reduce costs, not to mention benefit to employees) to become bigger part of union negotiations.
  • As result of new Performance Management Based Budgeting, more offices under other elected officials participating.  Budget Director said 99% compliance.
  • Offices not in agreement with Executive Budget are Public Defender, Chief Judge, State’s Attorney, Board of Review, and small variation with Clerk of the Court.
  • Have about 720 companies now certified for Contract Compliance, up from 300 a few years ago.
  • Roll out of new Time and Attendance system as well as rest of Enterprise Resource Planning going well.  
Commissioners present:  All except Goslin, Schneider, & Silvestri.

County Auditor
Proposed Budget: 
FY17 - $1,156 thousand ($995 thousand + $161 thousand in befit costs)  
FY16 - $925 thousand 
Difference -  increase (excluding benefits allocated) of $70 thousand.


Proposed FTEs:  12 vs. 12 in 2016.  No increase.

Key Information:  Thanks to support of Auditor shown by Board, all County offices cooperating with audits.

Commissioners present:  Moore, Sims, Steele, and Tobolski.

Department of Administrative Hearings
Proposed Budget: 
FY17 - $1.475 million ($1.350 million + $125,000 in benefit costs)
FY16 - $1.308 million
Difference -  increase (excluding benefits allocated) of $42,000.


Proposed FTEs:  9 vs. 9 in 2016.  No increase.

Key Information Presented:
  • Facilitates adjudication by Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) of ordinance violations issued by County departments
  • ALJs are independent contractors, and over half of budget goes to contracted services.
  • Average cost per case is $11.56 in 2016, far below costs of bringing cases to court, and down from $22.14 in 2015.
  • Under new state law, will also be able to adjudicate local municipal ordinance violations starting Jan. 1, 2017
  • Current 14 ALJs should be able to handle expected increased load
  • STAR targets for 2017 goals will improve on all 2016 expected results, and includes customer service satisfaction survey metric.

Commissioners present:  Butler, Moore, Sims, Steele, & Tobolski.

Observer - Priscilla Mims
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Individual authors are credited at the end of each post.

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015

    Categories

    All
    Assessor
    Ballot Referendum
    Board Of Review
    CCHHS
    Chief Judge
    Contracts
    Cook County Board
    Cook County Budget
    Cook County Health (CCH)
    Cook County Sheriff
    County Clerk
    Covid 19
    Criminal Justice
    Departmental Budget Hearings
    Economic Development
    Election Administration
    Environmental Control
    Ethics Ordinance
    Gun Violence
    Healthcare
    Independent Inspector General
    Paid Sick Leave
    Pensions
    Performance Based Management
    Police Matters
    Public Defender
    Recorder Of Deeds
    Shakman
    Soda Tax
    State's Attorney Office
    Taxes
    Tax Incentives
    Technology
    Transportation Plan

    RSS Feed

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF COOK COUNTY
332 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 634
Chicago, IL 60604

312/939-5935 x 127
info@lwvcookcounty.org
Terms and Conditions of Use
© Copyright League of Women Voters of Cook County, Illinois. All rights reserved.
Membership Information
CONTACT US
  • Home
  • About
    • LWVCC Positions
    • LWVCC Interest Groups >
      • Budget & Structure
      • Criminal Justice
      • Cook County Health
      • Forest Preserve Interest Group
    • Archived Newsletters
    • LWVCC Action and Testimony
    • LWVCC Activities
  • Observer Reports
    • Cook County Board Observer Reports
    • MWRD Board Observer Reports
    • CCH Board Observer Reports
    • Forest Preserve Board Observer Reports
  • Voter Info
  • Cook County Gov. Contacts
    • Cook County Board
    • Forest Preserve Board
    • Cook County Elected Officials
    • MWRD Board
    • Cook County Health Board