League of Women Voters of Cook County
  • Home
  • About
    • LWVCC Interest Groups >
      • Cook County Budget & Structure Group
      • Criminal Justice
      • Forest Preserve Interest Group
    • LWVCC Action and Testimony
    • LWVCC Activities
  • Observer Reports
    • Cook County Board Observer Reports
    • MWRD Board Observer Reports
    • Forest Preserve Board Observer Reports
    • CCH Board Observer Reports
  • Voter Info
  • Resources
    • Cook County Board
    • Forest Preserve Board
    • Cook County Elected Officials
    • MWRD Board
    • Cook County Health Board
    • Member Resources

MWRD Board Questions Cost of Lobbying Contract

1/11/2016

0 Comments

 
Observer: Kelly Kleiman
Meeting Date:  1/7/16   Length: 2 hour

Significant Decisions Made:

The whole meeting proceeded by consent calendar, which in turn was dominated by procurement/contract approval requests, and all but half a dozen of the 41 items  were approved.  Only a few were discussed individually.  
  • Stormwater Management Fund (Item 37): The Board approved allocation of the District’s Stormwater Management Fund property tax levy (5 cents/$100 assessed valuation) between operations (2 cents) and capital projects (3 cents).  District Executive Director David St. Pierre noted that every  penny’s worth of allocation returns $16 million in economic activity in the County. 
  • Resolution Recognizing Report (Item 40): In the same spirit, the Chicago Federation of Labor/Sierra Club report “A Flowing Economy” found that every $1 billion invested in clean water infrastructure creates 11,200 jobs throughout the economy and produces an 8 percent one-year GDP return on investment.  The CFL representative who spoke emphasized middle-class jobs, while the Sierra Club representative stressed the importance of battling invasive species, addressing flooding and reducing nutrient pollution. 
  • Defense of $1.8m Contract (Item 16): St. Pierre defended authorizing rehabilitation of District turbines to generate electricity using methane, on the basis that a $1.8 million expenditure would save $20 million in electric costs over the 20-year life of the restored machines.
Destruction of Records: Commissioner Shore asked whether an archivist or historian should be consulted before proceeding with Item 6 authorizing destruction of routine District records, but seemed satisfied with St. Pierre’s answer that this was neither feasible nor necessary.  Commissioner Avila asked whether fewer items could be printed to begin with, and St. Pierre agreed to audit current printing policies to try to reduce waste of paper.

Significant Topics Discussed and/or Referred to Committee

Lobbying Contract (Item 24): A contract for lobbying services, attracted significant discussion: its $417,000 cost was 42% higher than the next competing bid.  St. Pierre explained that this was the same price paid the same contractor previously; that it was within the RFP (in fact, it was the exact amount specified in the RFP); and that the contractor “gets results,” having secured $48 million from the Federal Government on a $32 million District request.  But he agreed to consult with District lawyers about whether, now that the contract had been awarded, he could ask the contractor for a price break (though it would be illegal to do so as a condition for the contract’s award).  

Other Comments or Observations:

​Given the frequency with which anti-union opinions are expressed at meetings of the County’s Health and Hospitals System Board, the pro-union tenor of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District meeting was quite striking.  Commissioners and staff spoke repeatedly and with pride about the middle-class jobs the District provides and supports.  Even more remarkable was the collaboration displayed by the Chicago Federation of Labor and the Sierra Club in producing the “Flowing Economy” report, when environmental and labor concerns are so often considered to be at odds.  The District has apparently decided that “green infrastructure” is where the twain can meet.
0 Comments

MWRD Finalizes 2016 Budget of $1.24 Billion and 2016 Property Tax Levy of $578 Million

1/1/2016

0 Comments

 
Observers:  Priscilla Mims and Laura Davis
Meeting Date: December 17, 2015
​
Significant Decisions Made: 

The 2016 Budget.  The MWRD Board at a Special Meeting on December 10 voted to approve a budget of $1,251,955,410 for the 2016 fiscal year that begins January 1.  Per law, the MWRD may revise the budget at the first regular Board meeting following that vote.  At this meeting, the Board approved a $20,000 increase to the Corporate Fund, bringing the total budget to $1,251,955,430.  The total budget for 2016 is $38 million higher, or 3.2% greater, than that for 2015.  The total number of positions is 1,976 (6 more positions than in 2015).  Motions to reconsider the budget failed, which means that the 2016 budget is now final.
 
The full budget is available on the MWRD web site: www.mwrd.org.  
 
The 2016 Property Tax Levy.  The MWRD also finalized the total 2016 property tax levy of $577,833,062.  The MWRD votes separately for the tax levies for each of the different funds:  Corporate, Construction, Reserve Claim, Stormwater Management, Retirement, and Bond Redemption and Interest funds.  Motions to reconsider these tax levies also failed, meaning that the tax levy is finalized. This is $18 million greater than 2015, which is a 3.3% increase.
 
Items to Watch for the Future: 
 
New rules for public speakers.  Under existing procedures, speakers may speak separately up to 3 minutes each on any individual item.  They may also ask questions within that time period.  At this meeting, George Blakemore spoke separately on several different items. A member of the Green Party also spoke and raised questions on different items that were responded to by Executive Director David St. Pierre following the 3 minute speaker limitation. Commissioner Michael Alvarez suggested that the MWRD Board look at other government bodies’ rules for public speakers and change to conform to them. Presumably, this will mean allowing a speaker to only speak once, rather than separately on different items. It may also mean eliminating the ability of speakers to raise questions that will be responded to.
 
Broadcasts of meetings. Commissioner Frank Avila asked that the Board look at televising the meetings on a public access channel. Currently, one can watch the meeting live via the web site, and videos of the meeting are made available on the web site after a short delay.
 
Next Meeting:  January 7, 2016 at 10 am.
0 Comments

    Author

    Individual authors are credited at the end of each report.

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015

    Categories

    All
    Affirmative Action Plan
    Bio Gas Production
    Bio-gas Production
    Bio Solids
    Bio-solids
    Bonds
    Budget
    Climate Action Plan
    Contracts
    Environmental Cleanup
    Ethics
    Flood Control
    Independent Inspector General MWRD
    Metropolitan Water Reclamation District
    MWRD
    Nutrient Trading
    Odor Control
    Pensions
    Prescription Drug Disposal
    Public Comments
    Rain Barrels
    Real Estate Issues
    Storm Water Management
    Taxes
    Tree Planting
    Water Quality
    Watershed Management

    RSS Feed

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF COOK COUNTY
332 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 634
Chicago, IL 60604

312/939-5935 
[email protected]
Terms and Conditions of Use
© Copyright League of Women Voters of Cook County, Illinois. All rights reserved.
Membership Information
CONTACT US
  • Home
  • About
    • LWVCC Interest Groups >
      • Cook County Budget & Structure Group
      • Criminal Justice
      • Forest Preserve Interest Group
    • LWVCC Action and Testimony
    • LWVCC Activities
  • Observer Reports
    • Cook County Board Observer Reports
    • MWRD Board Observer Reports
    • Forest Preserve Board Observer Reports
    • CCH Board Observer Reports
  • Voter Info
  • Resources
    • Cook County Board
    • Forest Preserve Board
    • Cook County Elected Officials
    • MWRD Board
    • Cook County Health Board
    • Member Resources